Apple is tightening the App Store just a little bit more with today’s story surfacing. The New York Times has reported that Sony’s Reader app has been rejected by Apple, so it will not appear in the App Store. They write:
The company has told some applications developers, including Sony, that they can no longer sell content, like e-books, within their apps, or let customers have access to purchases they have made outside the App Store.

If this is the reason, then will we see similar apps such as Kindle getting pulled? The article says that not only Sony, but several developers have been told that apps can no longer sell content, including e-books, within their apps. So, customers can not have access to purchases made that fall outside of the App Store. The Sony application would have enabled customers to buy books through the Sony store, like the Kindle app currently does. The article says that Apple told Sony that all in app purchases have to go through Apple. This information comes straight from Steve Haber, president of the digital reading division within Sony.
Currently with apps like Kindle allowed on the iPad / iPhone, users don’t need to buy the Kindle hardware to be able to read the books sold through the service. That fact may have swung purchases towards the iPad, but if this decision means that the Kindle app could be pulled, it may mean that they will push sales for the Kindle market.
Apple and Amazon are currently declining to comment on this issue.
“This sudden shift perhaps tells you something about Apple’s understanding of the value of its platform,” said James L. McQuivey, a consumer electronics analyst at Forrester Research. “Apple started making money with devices. Maybe the new thing that everyone recognizes is the unit of economic value is the platform, not the device.”
There are rumors circulating that Apple may be launching it’s own subscription based service, and it could be that this is in preparation for that.
I think it’s a bit ridiculous to sell books that will only be read on one device when there really is no need for it. Not to mention that if it wasn’t for the Kindle app initially then I would probably have read very little books on the iPad because when the Apple book store was launched they had so few books on it that it was a waste of my time even searching. It might mean that current collaborations with magazine publishers get a bit strained if they too start to wonder what limits will be imposed. I worry about my current purchase though the Kindle app, which has been my preference over Apple’s book store. (iBooks app shown right)
Do you use the Kindle app? Would you be happy to have no external content or do you think this is a huge step backwards?
Update: Apple has commented on the Sony complaints.
Article Via TUAW


FLICKR
YOUTUBE
RSS
yeah it was true ..thank you.. for sony reader at http://www.muselibrary.org/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHuge step backwards. If the Kindle app is pulled - since its the Killer App for me - I'll sell my iPad and get a different tablet.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDon't follow the guidelines, don't get into the app store. It's not exactly rocket science. Sony's stupid if they thought that they'd make it in.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWell Apple can be a little wooly on guidelines is the problem, and if it is just like the Kindle app then I'm not too sure why the Sony one should be rejected. I wonder if they will re-work it and re-submit though.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAs Christine says, very woolly indeed. I'll admit, my initial reaction (above) was due to being left with the impression that they did not necessarily break a pre-existing guideline, so I''ll relax my "Apple is eebil" stance a bit; however, there is precedence for Apple changing guidelines on-the-fly and at-whim. I think it would benefit their development ecosystem to be clear and consistent. Sony may be at fault for missing something, but on the other hand Apple's typical generalizations and willingness to re-interpret them might have something to do with it, too.
A large company like Sony typically has due diligence before a release that includes checking terms and conditions for 3rd-party development libraries, licenses, and rights and priveleges. I doubt they wilfully ignored the guideline; you have to admit it's at least possible with Apple's history and vague licenses that they got to related terms and said, "Wot does this mean, then?" "Beats me. I think we're good." "OK, well let's submit, then." That being the case, it's unsurprising that Sony would be upset at a rejection.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeProbably just a lead-up to the imminent in-app subscription scheme.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeApple should do what's best for consumers. This seems like a bad move.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIt's ridiculous. And every time Apple pulls something like this, I can recognize even the staunchest Apple apologists getting a little bit uneasy about defending their 'shining champion'.
As an employee in a software development company, I also can't help but lament the man hours it would have taken to build not only the rejected app, but all the apps that have been pitched from the store AFTER acceptance, just like the Kindle will be.
Man hours that could have been greatly reduced, mind you, if there weren't so many roadblocks to devloping in something other than pure Objective-C.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWell I don't think people having to learn how to code in a specific language or format is a problem, we can't all just up and develop for XBox etc but I do think there are inconsistencies within the approval - or non-aproval of apps in the store. I'm not really sure how that can be resolved though.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIt would surprise me if Apple pulled the Kindle application because of how big it is. I mean, who even has a Sony Reader? It's not in their best interests to keep the application.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYa I think most people have the Kindle app on their device, especially as there were nearly no books through the iBook's app when it started.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI think it's a colossal step backwards for Apple, but fairly typical of their usual behaviour.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like