Sony Reader app rejected

Apple is tightening the App Store just a little bit more with today’s story surfacing. The New York Times has reported that Sony’s Reader app has been rejected by Apple, so it will not appear in the App Store. They write:

The company has told some applications developers, including Sony, that they can no longer sell content, like e-books, within their apps, or let customers have access to purchases they have made outside the App Store.

Sony Reader app rejected

If this is the reason, then will we see similar apps such as Kindle getting pulled? The article says that not only Sony, but several developers have been told that apps can no longer sell content, including e-books, within their apps. So, customers can not have access to purchases made that fall outside of the App Store. The Sony application would have enabled customers to buy books through the Sony store, like the Kindle app currently does. The article says that Apple told Sony that all in app purchases have to go through Apple. This information comes straight from Steve Haber, president of the digital reading division within Sony.

Sony Reader app rejectedCurrently with apps like Kindle allowed on the iPad / iPhone, users don’t need to buy the Kindle hardware to be able to read the books sold through the service. That fact may have swung purchases towards the iPad, but if this decision means that the Kindle app could be pulled, it may mean that they will push sales for the Kindle market.

Apple and Amazon are currently declining to comment on this issue.

“This sudden shift perhaps tells you something about Apple’s understanding of the value of its platform,” said James L. McQuivey, a consumer electronics analyst at Forrester Research. “Apple started making money with devices. Maybe the new thing that everyone recognizes is the unit of economic value is the platform, not the device.”

There are rumors circulating that Apple may be launching it’s own subscription based service, and it could be that this is in preparation for that.

I think it’s a bit ridiculous to sell books that will only be read on one device when there really is no need for it. Not to mention that if it wasn’t for the Kindle app initially then I would probably have read very little books on the iPad because when the Apple book store was launched they had so few books on it that it was a waste of my time even searching. It might mean that current collaborations with magazine publishers get a bit strained if they too start to wonder what limits will be imposed. I worry about my current purchase though the Kindle app, which has been my preference over Apple’s book store. (iBooks app shown right)

Do you use the Kindle app? Would you be happy to have no external content or do you think this is a huge step backwards?

Update: Apple has commented on the Sony complaints.

Article Via TUAW

We're testing out a new service called Spread.Us. Help us share our stories!

About Christine Morris

Chatty Canadian in the UK. Dancing queen in my head. Digital Communications Lecturer. Mac computer fan. Mac makeup fan. iOS developer. Popcorn eater. Was producer & host of quirky app review show Apps & Hats, now moved on to this stuff. Tweet me I'm CMoz

View all posts by Christine Morris
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

yeah it was true ..thank you.. for sony reader at http://www.muselibrary.org/

Huge step backwards. If the Kindle app is pulled - since its the Killer App for me - I'll sell my iPad and get a different tablet.

Don't follow the guidelines, don't get into the app store. It's not exactly rocket science. Sony's stupid if they thought that they'd make it in.

Well Apple can be a little wooly on guidelines is the problem, and if it is just like the Kindle app then I'm not too sure why the Sony one should be rejected. I wonder if they will re-work it and re-submit though.

As Christine says, very woolly indeed. I'll admit, my initial reaction (above) was due to being left with the impression that they did not necessarily break a pre-existing guideline, so I''ll relax my "Apple is eebil" stance a bit; however, there is precedence for Apple changing guidelines on-the-fly and at-whim. I think it would benefit their development ecosystem to be clear and consistent. Sony may be at fault for missing something, but on the other hand Apple's typical generalizations and willingness to re-interpret them might have something to do with it, too.

A large company like Sony typically has due diligence before a release that includes checking terms and conditions for 3rd-party development libraries, licenses, and rights and priveleges. I doubt they wilfully ignored the guideline; you have to admit it's at least possible with Apple's history and vague licenses that they got to related terms and said, "Wot does this mean, then?" "Beats me. I think we're good." "OK, well let's submit, then." That being the case, it's unsurprising that Sony would be upset at a rejection.

Probably just a lead-up to the imminent in-app subscription scheme.

Apple should do what's best for consumers. This seems like a bad move.

It's ridiculous. And every time Apple pulls something like this, I can recognize even the staunchest Apple apologists getting a little bit uneasy about defending their 'shining champion'.

As an employee in a software development company, I also can't help but lament the man hours it would have taken to build not only the rejected app, but all the apps that have been pitched from the store AFTER acceptance, just like the Kindle will be.

Man hours that could have been greatly reduced, mind you, if there weren't so many roadblocks to devloping in something other than pure Objective-C.

Well I don't think people having to learn how to code in a specific language or format is a problem, we can't all just up and develop for XBox etc but I do think there are inconsistencies within the approval - or non-aproval of apps in the store. I'm not really sure how that can be resolved though.

It would surprise me if Apple pulled the Kindle application because of how big it is. I mean, who even has a Sony Reader? It's not in their best interests to keep the application.

Ya I think most people have the Kindle app on their device, especially as there were nearly no books through the iBook's app when it started.

I think it's a colossal step backwards for Apple, but fairly typical of their usual behaviour.