<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macgasm &#187; Brady Valentino</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macgasm.net/author/brady/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macgasm.net</link>
	<description>Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.macgasm.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Twitter and OS X &#8211; Heaven?</title>
		<link>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/20/twitter-and-os-x-heaven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/20/twitter-and-os-x-heaven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brady Valentino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mac News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgasm.net/?p=9790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems as though everyone today spends a lot of time looking for the best Twitter client for Mac OS X. There&#8217;s tons out there, each with their own unique feature set. Off the top of my head, I can think of Tweetie, Twitterrific, TweetDeck, Bluebird, twhirl, and Beak. So you&#8217;ve got all these choices, [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.macgasm.net">Macgasm - Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as though everyone today spends a lot of time looking for the best Twitter client for Mac OS X. There&#8217;s tons out there, each with their own unique feature set. Off the top of my head, I can think of <a href="http://atebits.com/tweetie-mac">Tweetie</a>, <a href="http://iconfactory.com/software/twitterrific">Twitterrific</a>, <a href="http://tweetdeck.com">TweetDeck</a>, <a href="http://bluebirdapp.com">Bluebird</a>, <a href="http://twhirl.org">twhirl</a>, and <a href="http://beakapp.com">Beak</a>. So you&#8217;ve got all these choices, but which should you use?</p>
<p>Now before you go questioning why you should be taking my word for it, you should know that I have tried and tested each app referenced above (I have no life, I know) and have been able to identify the best and worst. For this article we&#8217;re going to put focus on the first two, which I believe to be the best &#8211; <strong>Tweetie</strong> and <strong>Twitterrific</strong>. So without further ado, let&#8217;s get right into this.</p>
<h4>First up, Tweetie</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-19-at-12.55.44-PM.png"><a href="http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/20/twitter-and-os-x-heaven/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-9829" title="Screen shot 2009-11-19 at 12.55.44 PM" src="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-19-at-12.55.44-PM-150x150.png" alt="Screen shot 2009 11 19 at 12.55.44 PM 150x150 Twitter and OS X   Heaven?" width="100" height="100" /></a></a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever heard the saying <em>&#8220;Lead with your best foot forward!&#8221;</em> then you&#8217;ll understand why we&#8217;re starting off with <strong>Tweetie</strong>. It&#8217;s fast, it&#8217;s beautiful, and above all it has the most complete feature set that I&#8217;ve come across.</p>
<p><br class="spacer" /></p>
<p>A quick glance of the features:</p>
<ul>
<li>Unified timeline that includes tweets from those you follow, and @replies sent to you</li>
<li>Separate tabs for @replies, direct messages, and search</li>
<li>Multi-account support</li>
<li>Threaded conversations and direct messages</li>
<li>View user profiles</li>
<li>URL shortening with <strong>bit.ly, TinyURL, is.gd,</strong> and <strong>tr.im</strong></li>
<li>Direct image uploading to <strong>TwitPic, yFrog, img.ly,</strong> and <strong>Posterous</strong></li>
<li>Built-in Retweet and Reply support</li>
<li>Mark tweets as favourites</li>
</ul>
<p>Tweetie is one of those apps that you can lose yourself in for hours. It&#8217;s native OS X interface makes it feel right at home on your desktop, and it is incredibly easy to use. It&#8217;s very rare that you need to leave the comfort of your keyboard to access the commands and features.</p>
<p>There are a few things that make Tweetie stand out in my eyes. The first being built-in ability to retweet with the click of a button or a simple keyboard shortcut (<strong>Command + Option + R</strong>). It makes it extremely easy to share stuff with your followers that they usually wouldn&#8217;t see, which is one of the best things about Twitter itself. The second would be the separate tabs for <strong>replies</strong>, and <strong>direct messages</strong>. Having a unified timeline is nice and all (Which Tweetie does have), but that makes it extremely hard to find your older @replies. Having a tab is a great way to go back and re-read for whichever reason you&#8217;d want to. Another one of the biggest features for me is the ability to view threaded conversations (Like Twitter&#8217;s &#8216;in reply to&#8217; links in the Web interface, only it shows all the messages at once).</p>
<p><strong>The dark side *Insert epic Star Wars music*</strong><br />
With pros come the inevitability of cons. After all, nothing in this life is perfect right?</p>
<p>As a web designer and Apple junkie, I love minimalism, and it irks me that Tweetie isn&#8217;t very minimal. In fact, it takes up quite a bit of desktop real estate. You can only make the window so small, and even then it still takes up too much space. The inability to hide the dock icon adds to it&#8217;s large desktop footprint.</p>
<h4>Twitter, Terrific, Twitterrific!</h4>
<p><a href="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-19-at-12.59.35-PM.png"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-9839" title="Screen shot 2009-11-19 at 12.59.35 PM" src="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-19-at-12.59.35-PM-150x150.png" alt="Screen shot 2009 11 19 at 12.59.35 PM 150x150 Twitter and OS X   Heaven?" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Tweetie is the Twitter app that makes it&#8217;s presence known in your desktop environment. Twitterrific is its polar opposite. Twitterrific maintains a minimal interface and performance. It&#8217;s a powerful app that takes a backseat until you need to bring it forward to notify your followers of your daily musings.</p>
<p>The feature rundown:</p>
<ul>
<li>Simple and minimal user interface</li>
<li>Multi-account support <strong>(I have yet to see this in Twitterrific)</strong></li>
<li>Unified timeline that includes tweets, @replies, and direct messages</li>
<li>Unread tweets are shown in dock icon (If set to appear)</li>
<li>Automatically show the window when new tweets arrive</li>
<li><em>Single click access to user profile pages</em> (Launches web interface)</li>
<li>Collapse tweets in timeline</li>
</ul>
<p>Twitterrific is perfect if you&#8217;re like me and want a minimal desktop footprint. It&#8217;s extremely fast and features a clean OS X tooltip / HUD like interface. The ability to hide the dock icon and run Twitterrific from the menu bar is something that I find very valuable. Twitterrific also gives you the ability to auto-collapse all tweets, save for the one selected, in the timeline. I like this feature because it allows you to easily see who has tweeted, and when they did so.</p>
<p>Twitterrific&#8217;s product page over at The Iconfactory highlights the keyboard shortcuts as the biggest strength.</p>
<p><img src="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Screen-shot-2009-11-19-at-12.13.47-PM.png" alt="Screen shot 2009 11 19 at 12.13.47 PM Twitter and OS X   Heaven?"  title="Twitter and OS X   Heaven?" /></p>
<p>The unified timeline helps Twitterrific&#8217;s minimal appearance, but makes it very difficult to track your @replies and direct messages. Instead of switching tabs, a la Tweetie, you&#8217;re required to scroll your way through the list of tweets all the way to the end, where Twitterrific blindly sticks your older @replies and direct messages. The lack of built-in retweet support is another glaring weakness in Twitterrific&#8217;s UI. Mac OS X is all about ease of use, but you wouldn&#8217;t guess that while you&#8217;re copying and pasting your favourite tweets to retweet them to your followers.</p>
<h4>Quick rundown of the rest</h4>
<p><strong>TweetDeck</strong> <a href="http://tweetdeck.com">(view)</a><br />
TweetDeck is an app that runs on Adobe AIR, and is perfect for those who want more organization that the average Twitter app offers. TweetDeck is built around the idea of a multi-column filing system, where you can group certain friends together (Twitter lists anyone?)  and shun out the rest. The default layout shows a column for the main timeline, your @replies, and direct messages.</p>
<p>The user has the ability to add, remove, and rearrange columns as they see fit. I myself used TweetDeck to seperate those I follow into categories based on their niche (Designer, Coder, Apple, News, etc..). At one point I even removed the main column and replaced it with a group just of Twits that I wanted to keep up with on a daily basis.</p>
<p><strong>Bluebird</strong> <a href="http://bluebirdapp.com">(view)</a><br />
Bluebird is a standalone Twitter app that has a beautiful OS X interface. What sets this app apart from others is the theming capabilities. Bluebird supports XHTML and CSS theming to truly make your Twitter desktop experience unique.</p>
<p><strong>twhirl</strong> <a href="http://twhirl.org">(view)</a><br />
Twhirl is another application that runs off the Adobe AIR framework. It has a UI very similar to that of <strong>Twitterrific</strong>, but sets itself apart with the ability to use built in themes. You can choose from a variety of different styles, my favourite being the Crimson style.</p>
<p><strong>Beak</strong> <a href="http://beakapp.com">(view)</a><br />
Beak is a standalone Twitter desktop that sports a beautiful native OS X look and feel. It offers many of the features of <strong>Tweetie</strong> but adds a degree of minimalism. The tabbed interfaces helps you navigate between the timeline, @replies, direct messages, favourites, search, and stats. The tabs however are at the top, as to not make the window wide and clunky.</p>
<p>My favourite feature of Beak is the inline reply capabilities, which allow you to directly reply any tweet you see in your timeline.</p>
<h4>So, captain, which will it be?</h4>
<p>It&#8217;s always hard to pick a definitive answer when deciding between two great things, for example &#8211; Safari vs. Firefox, Coke vs. Pepsi, Mac<strong>Book</strong> vs. <del>PC</del> iMac. At this point I&#8217;m using Twitterrific, but my indecisive self will likely switch back to Tweetie in a few days, and so on and so forth until <a href="http://atebits.com">Atebits</a> and <a href="http://iconfactory.com">The Iconfactory</a> join forces to create the perfect Twitter client. <em>We can all dream, can&#8217;t we?</em> Who knows, maybe I&#8217;ll even bust out Bluebird for a bit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macgasm.net">Macgasm - Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/20/twitter-and-os-x-heaven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telus brings iPhone woes</title>
		<link>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/19/telus-brings-iphone-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/19/telus-brings-iphone-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brady Valentino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fido]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgasm.net/?p=9853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As you may have previously read, Telus is suing Rogers over their advertising campaign in which they tout themselves as Canada&#8217;s fastest mobile network and Canada&#8217;s most reliable network. As we reported earlier, an iPhone user living in Toronto posted a video on YouTube of speed tests between the Telus / Bell network and the [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.macgasm.net">Macgasm - Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/iphone.png"><a href="http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/19/telus-brings-iphone-woes/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9872" title="iPhone 3G" src="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/iphone-200x300.png" alt="iphone 200x300 Telus brings iPhone woes" width="200" height="300" /></a></a>As you may have previously read, Telus is suing Rogers over their advertising campaign in which they tout themselves as <em>Canada&#8217;s fastest mobile network</em> and <em>Canada&#8217;s most reliable network</em>. As we <a href="http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/19/fido-bell-is-really-sticking-it-to-rogers-in-speed-tests/">reported earlier</a>, an iPhone user living in Toronto posted a video on YouTube of speed tests between the Telus / Bell network and the Rogers / Fido network. The results were shocking as the former was pushing 5250 kb/s and the latter only 2611 kb/s.</p>
<p>It would appear as though Telus has the upper hand here, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Telus may have the lead on the <em>fastest mobile network</em> lawsuit, but the <em>most reliable network</em>? That&#8217;s a whole other story. It appears as though when <em>Bellus</em> launched their spiffy new HSPA+ network, they did not give it a GSM underlying. What this means is that if you turn off 3G <strong>(Settings -&gt; General -&gt; Network -&gt; Enable 3G -&gt; OFF)</strong>, or your connection is lost, your brand new iPhone is basically turned into an iPod touch. No calls and no SMS.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got an iPhone 3G or iPhone 3GS with Telus or Bell, give it a try yourself.</p>
<p>While Telus may be faster, it&#8217;s clear that Rogers is definitely more reliable. What do you think?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macgasm.net">Macgasm - Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/19/telus-brings-iphone-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple released 10.6.2, but there&#8217;s a lot of complaints out there.</title>
		<link>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/11/apple-releases-10-6-2-lots-of-fixes-lots-of-complaints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/11/apple-releases-10-6-2-lots-of-fixes-lots-of-complaints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brady Valentino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mac News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macgasm.net/?p=9458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently Apple released OS X 10.6.2 which features an extensive list of updates, fixes, and addresses many issues. It appears as if the update, which Apple stated is supposed to enhance the stability, performance, and compatibility of your Mac, has done the opposite for some less than happy users. As a recent convert to Mac [...]</p><p><a href="http://www.macgasm.net">Macgasm - Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/safari.jpg"><a href="http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/11/apple-releases-10-6-2-lots-of-fixes-lots-of-complaints/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9507" title="Safari Issue" src="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/safari-300x152.jpg" alt="safari 300x152 Apple released 10.6.2, but theres a lot of complaints out there." width="300" height="152" /></a></a>Recently Apple <a href="http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/09/yay-10-6-2-is-out/">released</a> OS X 10.6.2 which features an <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3874">extensive list</a> of updates, fixes, and addresses many issues. It appears as if the update, which Apple stated is supposed to enhance the stability, performance, and compatibility of your Mac, has done the opposite for some <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2229872&amp;tstart=0">less</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2229700&amp;tstart=0">than</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2229797&amp;tstart=0">happy</a> <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=818260">users</a>.<span id="more-9458"></span></p>
<p>As a recent convert to Mac myself, I haven&#8217;t had to deal with the trials and tribulations of a major OS overhaul. But I&#8217;d be lying if I said that I haven&#8217;t had my fair share of issues with OS X, and have still found no solution to my <a href="http://cdn.macgasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/safari.jpg">aching Safari issue</a>. That small little bug has been kicking around for about a month and a half now, and I&#8217;ve tried every possible solution you could think of. I had a spark of hope when I read the release notes for 10.6.2 and noticed they listed a few Safari fixes. I was hesitant to upgrade due to the complaints about 10.6.2 but finally took the plunge out of desperation for a solution. As you might have guessed, it didn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>I suppose my hope for the update fixing the problem could be attributed to Apple&#8217;s lack of explanation when it comes to release notes. In their rush to push out the latest update, they always slack their way through the notes leaving us users guessing as to what exactly has been fixed.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<blockquote><p>an issue that caused data to be deleted when using a guest account</p></blockquote>
<p>Which issue was causing what data to be deleted?</p>
<blockquote><p>an issue with the four-finger swipe gesture</p></blockquote>
<p>What was the issue and how was it addressed?</p>
<p>And my personal favourite:</p>
<blockquote><p>the reliability of menu extras</p></blockquote>
<p>Does anyone honestly know what that&#8217;s supposed to mean?</p>
<p>For now I&#8217;m stuck waiting for yet another upgrade, and many others are stuck with broken, bugged, and glitched software that are making for an unhappy computing experience.</p>
<p>What do you think about Apple&#8217;s vague notes, or 10.6.2 in general? Let us know in the comments.</p>
<p>Also, if you think you can help with my Safari issue, shoot me an email. :)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macgasm.net">Macgasm - Apple Tips, Apple News, Apple Everything.</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.macgasm.net/2009/11/11/apple-releases-10-6-2-lots-of-fixes-lots-of-complaints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via cdn.macgasm.net

Served from: www.macgasm.net @ 2012-02-09 09:23:19 -->
