Apple is in some hot water with New York-based photographer Taea Thale for using one of her photos in an iPhone television advertisement that focuses on Zooey Deschanel’s band She & Him. The advertisement focuses on how easy it is to download music and get concert listings with the iPhone.
Downloading the album is done in iTunes, an application that Apple has obviously built. Buying concert tickets is done in iLike, an application not developed by Apple, and instead is a service that is in partnership with Myspace Music.
Following still?
Taea Thale’s photo of the band She & Him appears in the iLike application, so she has decided to sue Apple for using the photo in their advertisement, because Thale didn’t grant Apple any rights to use the photo for advertising purposes, despite the photo being part of the iLike application.
Here’s the awesome part. Section 3.2 of the iOS Developer Program License Agreement reads:
(d) To the best of Your knowledge and belief, Your Application and Licensed Application Information do not and will not violate, misappropriate, or infringe any Apple or third party copyrights, trademarks, rights of privacy and publicity, trade secrets, patents, or other proprietary or legal rights (e.g. musical composition or performance rights, video rights, photography or image rights, logo rights, third party data rights, etc. for content and materials that may be included in Your Application);
Just in case you haven’t read the block quote, Apple clearly indicates that developers control all copyrights associated with their applications, and that developers should not include media that they have no legal right to use.
iLike used the photo of She & Him; Apple gets sued.
It’s going to be really interesting to see how this one plays out in the coming weeks. Will iLike get yanked from the App Store for copyright violation? Is Apple responsible for the copyright infringement despite clearly pointing out in section 3.2 of the Developer Agreement that applications avoid this kind of thing?
I’m not a lawyer, so I have no idea. But if you ask me, Taea Thale should be suing iLike, not Apple.
Check out the video yourself
Source: The Loop
FLICKR
YOUTUBE
RSS
I would think this all depends on the type of license iLike has in regards to the use of the image.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is actually the best description of the case I've read.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeiSue Happy!
She is suing Apple because the app dev probably doesn't make much money and therefore could never pay as much as Apple. Unortunely, this is how our crappy government works. It happens all the time.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'm not going to lie, that's the first thing that crossed my mind as well.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'm not a lawyer, either, but Apple isn't getting sued for the image being in the app. Apple is being sued for putting the image in an ad.
Even if iLike itself had the rights to the photo for in-app usage, it's not likely they were granted rights to the photo for video advertising. It's rare for licensing to be "for anything," it's usually for specific usages.
The artist's lawyers probably considered who violated the copyright, too, and although lawyers get a bad rap sometimes, they're not generally schtoopid.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExactly, I think this is about the ad, not about the app per se. This is just like Eminem suing Apple for using one of his songs in an ad.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExcellent point. I don't have much to say other than that.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is exactly right. Consider this: I buy a can of Coke. Clearly I have the right to drink the Coke. Do I also have the right to run a national television ad promoting my product using the can of Coke? Try that and see where it gets you.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like