Rumor: MacBook Air going ARM by the end of 2012

May 10, 2011

Apple Inc., Mac, Misc. News, Rumors

If the Apple lineup is going ARM, which for the record many journalists don’t believe this point, the MacBook Air may be the first Mac to migrate to the ARM chipset. Better battery life and ultra-portability are obviously things Apple’s been taking very seriously across their entire lineup, especially when it comes to the MacBook Air. But, the question remains, is there value in leaving behind Intel and adopting yet another CPU architecture, the third in the span of six years?

According to Barron’s, Barclays analyst Ben Reitzes seems to think so:

We believe that Apple will be the first in our sector to embrace ARM for some Macs, as early as C2H12…

We believe that Apple is already working hard on the software to accomplish this feat within the MacBook Air line-up. Through its own development of ARM-based processors and ARM-based iOS software, this migration would be rather natural for Apple. Apple is already moving toward enhanced battery life and ultra portability with its current MacBook Air line, which uses NAND instead of HDDs.

If Apple chooses to make the move, we doubt it will be very difficult for the company to maintain support for both Intel and ARM systems. They pulled it off flawlessly with universal builds during the Power PC (PPC) to Intel transition. The only people who would say otherwise are those that may still be rocking a PPC device.

The only thing Apple should be worrying about at this point, if this rumor turns out to be true, is the long term implications associated with moving to ARM. Those of us who were around during the PPC years remember just how annoying it was when Intel blew past PPC speeds, leaving PPC in the dust, and ultimately dead. It wasn’t fun.

Also, what about all of those giant companies (Blizzard, Autodesk) that have titles for OS X now? Are they willing to design there products around ARM? It may not matter for the MacBook Air — people won’t be gaming, or building CAD designs much on a machine of that calibre — but if the iMac and Mac Pro are going ARM like Reitzes suggests, then we may see some problems.  Apple better be confident that these companies are willing to go along for the ride before making the switch, because frankly put, I’m not.  But, that’s also why I don’t make the big decisions over at Apple Inc.

Apple had absolutely nothing to lose switching from PPC to Intel back in 2005, but switching from Intel to ARM may prove to be a more difficult transition than the PPC to Intel switch. Getting the MacBook Air onto an ARM chipset makes the most sense, but that doesn’t mean Apple’s ready to make the switch either.

Article Via: Barron’s
Photo Credit: Tim Trueman

, , ,

About Joshua Schnell

It started as a hobby and turned into a full-time job for Josh. One minute he was keeping notes on his switch to the Mac and the next thing he knew he was the full time Editor-In-Chief for Macgasm. He spent his early years designing and developing Web sites, but now it's all writing, all the time. Josh also currently contributes to PCWorld. He produces two podcasts, The Macgasm Podcast, and The AppOrchard, and can be heard on CBC Radio once every couple of years, despite secretly wishing that was a more frequent gig.

View all posts by Joshua Schnell
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

hi there yeah arm cpus i think i hear corectly 2012 will have up tooo 512 gb ssd and 8 gb ram and 2015 16 gb ram and 1 tb ssd or anouther way 1 terabyte ssd 1 terabyte flash probaly replace hard drives for good

Apple had nothing to loose? Damn. Not only did they kill flavors, but then they decided to not "think different" anymore and switch from risc to x86. A part of my Apple love died right when I heard that news.

Hopefully Apple switches back to risc for all computing, via the arm processor. My iPad 2 is only 1 ghz and is a lot faster than most friends x86 windows machines with low heat and amazing battery life.

Maybe in 2021 we will have flavors again. :( Sick of black or white.

I'm wondering what implications this has for running Windows on future ARM platforms. I was able to switch to Mac on Intel because I could still run the Windows applications required in my work life. I'm now down to only a handful of applications that require me to fire up Parallels. But I don't see my occasional need for Windows going away completely in the next couple years. I'd hate to have to go back to Windows just to coexist with my clients and co-workers.

For most people, there is no real need to use windows, businesses included. They think that you can not perform the same tasks on a Mac (or linux)... Or that files on a Mac will not work on windows. Idiots.

Not idiots, just victims of Apple's lack of focus on certain industries. If Lexis-Nexis ever wakes up and ports its applications off Windows, I'll be set. Until then, I have little choice if I want to share information with colleagues.

Capitalist BS...good one.

How many years before this comes to fruition in even the Air line, where it makes sense? Can software developers handle two chipsets, or is there a magic translator to make say, Office, work on both, or do we give up on some software titles if we go to an ARM Air? It is intriguing to consider even more battery life.

Of course I would be surprised if the running dog capitalist pigs at Intel don't like, do something to compete?

here we go again with this capitalist BS... they are only changing this crap so that we all have to go buy another round of hardware cause out intel chips will be called obsolete just like our PPC chips were... they only want you to keep your hardware for 3 years now