What would it take for you to buy a MacBook Air 3G edition laptop? Would you even buy one? Apple’s asking customers those questions lately, and it certainly has me pausing for a moment to think about the implications of putting 3G access into my laptop. According to Apple Insider, Apple’s been surveying current MacBook Air owners, and asking a lot of questions about their usage. In particular, they’re focusing on 3G and wireless usage patterns.
In my opinion, a parallel can be drawn from my WiFi-only iPad and my brothers iPad 3G. Simply put, I made the wrong decision, and he made the right decision. Those random moments when you’re driving down the highway and you want to look for directions, answer an email on the road, or check the latest hockey scores are some things I can’t do, but he can. A MacBook Air with 3G is going to provide more utility than a MacBook Air without 3G. Given the battery life, small footprint, and speed of the MacBook Air, it seems like the next logical step would be to include 3G.
But, there’s WiFi everywhere
I know what you’re thinking. I’m also within range of a WiFi base station 90 percent of the time. But, this argument isn’t all that valid in my opinion. Pretend for a moment that another 3G device added on to your wireless bill every month wouldn’t be a huge burden and added cost. What would you buy, a 3G MacBook Air or a WiFi MacBook Air? Without the added cost, I’d argue that most would opt for the 3G model. I know I would. Right now I can’t justify the extra cost per month, but if that cost wasn’t so expensive I’d opt for the on-anywhere 3G service every single time.
Apple would be smart to add 3G into their entire laptop line, let alone the MacBook Air. I already look longingly at the latest MacBook Air, but knowing that I could get the internet on it, without tethering, while out on the town, will easily force me to stop longing for the device, and instead replace my MacBook Pro with one immediately.
What do you think? Would Apple be better off with a 3G model of the MacBook Air? I’m sitting with Scott Annan, CEO of Mercury Grove right now, and he made an excellent point. If carriers offered a consolidated dataplan, it wouldn’t make sense to pass up the 3G edition.
As it stands, 3G proliferation is in the hands of carriers, not Apple. That won’t be changing any time soon unfortunately.
Article Via Apple Insider
Photo Credit: Brennan Schnell


FLICKR
YOUTUBE
RSS
I am thinking about purchasing a MacBook Air but the 3G does not excite me, unless the data plans can be consolidated. My iPhone has a data plan, my iPad is wireless only. If I don't have wireless, I can get by with 3G on my phone. I wanted the 3G iPad, was not going to pay for a 2nd plan.
It's not that I can't afford a separate data plan for every device, it's an irresponsible waste of money and I refuse to pay for multiple data plans.
Yes, I am a tightwad.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYes, I want MBA with 3G. I also want backlit keyboard. I want Sandy Bridge. If possible, I want more than 256 GB. Pretty Please! I dont care what that gonna cost me - gimme all this in june! I buy, I promise!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThat would be awesome! I have a Macbook which I love but if they did make one w/3G I''ll buy it even if I don't eat for a month..it's Apple, right?
;)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeits called an iphone....
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNot sure about driving down the highway while using my iPad. However, when I saw the 11" MacBook Air the first thing that came to my mind was "Add cellular data and I just might dump my iPad".
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNot sure why you'd be holding an iPad or MacBook air while driving...sounds dangerous
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeA consolidated data plan would be great, but carriers prefer to sell data on a per device basis. As far as I'm concerned, other than the nominal cost of a SIM for each device there should be no extra cost for running multiple devices.
On another note, the lack of tethering creates an unnecessary redundancy. Why do I need a 3G iPad/Air etc if I already have a 3G iPhone in my pocket at all times? Allowing tethering (or hotspot access) makes more sense.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe cost isn't just a small "if", though. Far too much of a luxury for the common man to add another expensive data-consuming device to a mobile plan. It's decadent to the point that only employees having the plan paid for by a company that needs them to have continuous access would have it, or rich people.
It makes way more sense for there to just be tethering; if you really need data on the road, and it needs to be on your laptop instead of your phone, just use the phone as the communication device.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeBut ... if you have a phone that can do tethering then I imagine you are "rich" enough to afford a smartphone and a data plan.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI dont want to use my iPhone battery when I´m using MBA.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNot really, how can you check a Google Map while on Verizon? Hrmmm? ;)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like