Clicky

4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else.



Joshua Schnell | Tue, Nov 3, 2009

I’ve spend a great amount of time over the last year wondering if we’re doing the right thing here at Macgasm. Are we covering a genre that will be successful, or would we be better served jumping on some other popular bandwagon. Over the last couple of months I’ve been pretty resolute about my decision. So, I thought I’d put together a quick list of the reasons that I absolutely love covering Apple and the world that surrounds it.

apple-applicationsThe Applications

We take a lot of flack for being unable to customize our Apple experience from Windows users, and in the early days it really annoyed me, but we’ve got something way better than customization. We have amazing applications that do what they promise, and at reasonable prices. Pixelmator comes to mind here. It’s an amazing image editing application, and it weighs in at a measly 67.84 for us Canadians. I’d like to see a rival application on another operating system. As far as I’m concerned we have some of the best programs out there, and people take notice. Writing about these applications are more of a treat than they are a pain in the butt. Half the articles just write themselves because the applications just work. There’s a multitude of applications and a ton of innovation being made. The kicker, the image icons. It sure makes one’s blog look a lot sexier when you have application icons that are as gorgeous as they are on the Mac.

apple-developersThe Developers

The next logical extension after the sweet applications that we have access to is the kick ass indie developers that are holding up the mac community on their shoulders. Google got it right when they linked the phrase “standing on the shoulders of giants” to their scholar search, and I’d argue that this phrase can be applied to the developers that make our lives easier. There’s no shortage of applications to get the job done, and there’s enough variety that we can write about a topic two or three times and not feel like we’re repeating ourselves. Take for instance both 1Password and Wallet, they both do the same thing (pretty much anyway), and they’re both great at it. I’d have no problem recommending either. Once you add in the fact that the indie developers really get how the community works, and you now have a recipe for a lot of content. They get you what you need, and they get it to you fast. I spent some time in college working on a general tech website, and I have to tell you, some other communities can really take a page out of the indie Mac developers play books. It’s a real treat working with these people day in and day out, and not too many people can say that.

apple-hardwareThe Hardware

There’s innovators and there’s stagnators, and Apple’s definitely on of the innovators. The technology industry is filled with innovating companies, and when you can participate in discourse that surrounds those companies, you’ll be rewarded on a personal level. It’s a lot more fun talking about things that push the envelope than it is talking about things that hover in time. Apple puts out hardware that’s easy to get emotionally tied to, and it helps to elicit passionate discourse one way or another. I absolutely hate the original Mighty Mouse, and I’d defend that stance to the death, but on the flip side, this unibody Macbook Pro I have is probably the best machine I’ve ever owned. It’s easy for me to talk about, because I’m passionate about them, and that’s directly attributed to Apple. Plus, if Apple ceased to exist, then this blog would close in a hurry, so we have to thank them on some level, don’t we?

apple-communityThe Community

I’ve spent a lot of time in different technology related communities, and absolutely nothing comes close to being as supportive and understanding as the Mac Community. It absolutely blows my mind. I can’t even being to explain how that happened, but it’s certainly noticeable, and most people in the community realize it. I’ve never once been told by another user that I need to pay a consulting fee to get help, and I’ve certainly never been told to “RTFM” or “Google it” when I go looking for help. Instead, I get a bunch of active volunteers, who seem to be sitting around waiting to help others. That’s something I can get behind, heck, that’s a philosophy that we built the website on. It makes loving the Apple community easy, and it certainly helps those new to the scene in ways that’s some other communities are seriously lacking around the internet. Everyone’s here to help, and that’s why I do what I do. It’s a lot nicer to help people than it is to deal with a bunch of trolls yelling RTFM at me all the time.

Image Credits: corebasis and kylekrall and Blakes Seven
and TheNixer

If you love us you'll share it:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Mixx
  • Propeller

Contact the author

14 Tweets 9 Other Comments

34 Responses to “4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else.”

  1. asciilogic Says:

    Very good article. It pretty much sums up how I feel.

    Reply

      More from author
  2. TeamNutmeg Says:

    re: Pixelmator, from the description of its features on the website, I’d say I could probably match it with Corel’s (formerly JASC’s) Paint Shop Pro, currently US$40. It’s been the budget alternative to Photoshop on Windows for a decade now.

    On all your other points I agree, especially about the community – and especially compared to the Linux community, the kings of “RTFM.” I think the smaller size of that community is actually an advantage when it comes to developers, who can rely on seeing a certain type of person using their product, and can cater thereto.

    Reply

  3. Khürt Says:

    “It’s easy for me to talk about, because I’m passionate about them, and that’s directly attributed to Apple.”

    That sums up why I blog about my mac|Life.

    Reply

      More from author
  4. joerg Says:

    right on!

    Reply

  5. Chris Boulos Says:

    That summed up exactly how I feel about Apple and you are absolutely right about the community being very supportive. I myself take the liberty of volunteering my help to any friend of mine who buys an apple product I have even converted tons of people from PC to Mac even my brothers whole company.

    Reply

  6. waynedixon Says:

    Macgasm.net: 4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else.: I’ve spend a great amount of time over … http://bit.ly/15wiso

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  7. macgasm Says:

    These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  8. christyxcore Says:

    RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  9. MacfusionGirl Says:

    RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  10. i_Girl Says:

    4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else. | Macgasm http://j.mp/326tr3

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  11. sofiafontes Says:

    RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  12. i_Girl Says:

    RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  13. MacSheikh Says:

    RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  14. npann Says:

    These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://bit.ly/29FhSP – COOL! (via @macgasm @christyxcore @foleypod)

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  15. gbmiii Says:

    gbmiii [ff] – Joshua Schnell: 4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else. http://ow.ly/15Zdtl

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  16. mcgeneral Says:

    gbmiii [ff] – Joshua Schnell: 4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else. http://ow.ly/15Zdtk

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  17. lonelycoo Says:

    RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  18. charleymarley Says:

    And why I do too! RT @macgasm: These are the reasons I blog about Apple Inc. http://su.pr/2mJyCc

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  19. DebSiddharth Says:

    Liked “4 reasons why I write about Apple instead of something else.” http://ff.im/-aWr3P

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

    Reply

      More from author
  20. patrickj Says:

    Very good post Joshua. I agree that having no vetting process at all sounds like an awfully bad idea from a user standpoint. Also agree that any vetting beyond soundness / safety of code kinda thing should be jettisoned, so that all the ridiculous, subjective, inconsistent nonsense could be a thing of the past. Why do the words ‘dream on’ spring to mind when I write that last bit?

    Oh, and I do still think that the words and actions of Hewitt and Rogue Amoeba are very damaging from a PR / image perspective.

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  21. Jesse Says:

    I agree with that. That’s definitely what I’m thinking since a long time ago.

    But, as a long time iPhone Dev. Joe Hewitt has truth in what he said.
    iPhone apps have very few chances or capabilities to ruin your phone.

    Apple has designed the iPhone app bundle to be sandboxed, unable to do dangerous things that would ruin the device’s basic capabilities.

    Unless if you installed an unofficial app for jailbroken phones, which has a lot more system-changing capabilities.

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  22. Joshua Schnell Says:

    Well, to borrow an overly used saying, “Rome wasn’t built in one day.” I didn’t expect the AppStore to be perfect at the time of its release, but I certainly didn’t expect it to take this much time to evolve either. It has a long way to go, and I can easily understand that, the fact that developers are crying about it because they can’t get paid quick enough is really annoying. Talk about a generation of entitlement. /rant

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  23. Joshua Schnell Says:

    See, what happens if the AppStore was completely open? An AppStore where there is no vetting process, and no hardware locks on the devices? That’s what a lot of developers are asking for, and that’s what a truly open appstore would become. If a phone came unlocked, or jailbroken as we now refer to it, there would be a very good chance that an app could brick your iPhone. Nothing would be sandboxing developers in, and the only reason a sandbox currently exists at all is because Apple put it there to begin with. Take away that Apple owned sandbox and you’re going to be left with a wild west without the hot cow girls.

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  24. Jesse Says:

    I don’t completely agree with “no review” situation, I already said that many times in other places. But, I was referring to your assumption that an app built with official iPhone SDK will be able to do dangerous things on the phone.

    It couldn’t do much (as Joe had said), unless the unofficial apps from Cydia which requires a firmware to be Pwned.

    I’m not even talking about unofficial apps or jailbroken ones, there’s no intended relation between a “transparent” App Store and an “open iPhone”.

    It’s purely about the assumption that an officially signed app, built with iPhone SDK would be able to do dangerous things. The worst that it could do are:

    - Exhausting the current memory on the phone, and it exits, because of memory warning.
    - Crashing apps, which just exits.
    - Messing around with your contacts using address book API (but this is a security problem).
    - Add more here, please.

    So it has very few chances to eat the OS :-).

    Because we’re not talking about jailbroken phones. But, a legit app, that has not pass the review stage. (Apple themselves do not really test all apps for proper functionality 100%).

    Let me defend Joe a little bit, regarding this, not Rogue Amoeba:

    1. Facebook app is not a paid app.

    2. He has his rights to quit his iPhone Dev project. (TechCrunch is making too much noise out of it).

    3. Facebook will continue to be maintained by other developers, which I’m sure will have the capabilities to maintain it.

    4. It’s “Joe’s decision” not Facebook’s decision.

    Referring to iPhone Devs as greedy is a very discriminative opinion.

    The people who are not quitting are:
    - Companies who keep on investing the platform with their massive amount of apps with similar basic functions, but different content. These people don’t care about quality, they know how to take advantage some workforce to “churn out” apps. Hundreds may be rejected, hundreds more are in the store.

    - Devs who doesn’t give up on the platform, and still making their efforts to be successful.

    The people who quits:

    - Those who want to do something else. Well if their apps doesn’t make a dime, why bother ?
    If atebits quits, then people could complain, but his app is in the store and works fine. Not screwing the phone.

    - Those people like Joe Hewitt, who prefer to do web development. (He’s working at Facebook remember. It’s better to send complaints to Facebook).

    - Rogue Amoeba (they had done something that violates iPhone SDK’s agreement, so it’s reasonable to make complaints to them).

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  25. Joshua Schnell Says:

    I think the whole argument about apps not being able to cause much harm is a bit misleading. I’ve installed a number of applications on my phone that have caused the device to act in ways that are not normal. Phone restarting or shutting down unexpectedly being a key case in point. My phone isn’t jailbroken in any way.

    As for the greed, I don’t mean to imply that either Rogue Amoeba or Facebook are acting out of greed. Instead, they are used in this article to frame the current discourse on AppStore issues. There is a large demographic of developers who create one off applications with no plan of supporting their applications, but still continue to charge for them. I think both Hewitt and the R.A. team have some valid points about approval times, but my point on a whole is that they need to take a step backwards and look at the process from a consumer lens. Hope this clears some things up a little.

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  26. James Katt Says:

    Apple doesn’t totally sandbox apps.

    Developers know that.

    All a developer has to do is to use undocumented features to get out of the sandbox.

    Examples of this are in the jailbroken iPhone marketplace.

    This is why an open App Store is dangerous for the consumer.

    Apple has been continuously refining its App Store vetting process. Thus as time goes on, things will improve.

    I don’t like those developers that WHINE, WHINE, WHINE. They should get out of iPhone development. Good riddance when they leave. The other app developers can be left to making tons of money.

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  27. Joshua Schnell Says:

    Sounds like we’re on the same page. :)

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author
  28. Jesse Says:

    Again, still in my view of “it should be fair, transparent, efficient, and communicative, instead of completely none” review process.

    Okay some official apps could do these:
    - Steal phone numbers (Unity game engine).
    - Messing around using address book API (there’s one company doing this, and it finally got caught).
    - Make a prank call (although the app just exits afterward).
    - Reboot the phone accidentally.
    - Hangs the phone.

    All of these are the things that Apple could solve by adding some more restrictions to the API. They have the full control to protect the private API.

    Now, your claim is quite invalid in the case of “All a developer has to do is to use undocumented features to get out of the sandbox.”

    It’s not enough. They have to be able to communicate and operate “system-wide”.

    They need to be able to run in the background for some situation, or else it just stops functioning (iPhone OS only allows one app running at a time).

    It needs to be installed in the filesystem, not the sandbox folder (App Store could not install apps outside the sandbox).

    In the case of jailbroken apps, those apps are not living in the sandbox as most official apps. They’re installed directly on the iPhone filesystem as most of other iPhone OS built-in apps. This is controlled by Cydia.

    Some apps in the jailbroken system (which are using undocumented API) are also taking advantage of intermediate system such as WinterBoard, MobileSubstrate, SBSettings, or I don’t know what else.

    There are some that’s taking advantage of some unix binaries, a port of the existing binaries from the Intel platform (desktop).

    If we’re just using the undocumented APIs, we could not access or execute these binaries.

    The point is,
    Of all App Store whiners, lots of them knows what’s best for users and what will be great for their apps.

    Some of them are just pure whiners who just want to win the popularity contest in the App Store. But, not all of them.

    But, the way Apple communicates by closing in on them, putting up silly reasons for rejections doesn’t help at all. That’s the thing that never changes until now, ever since devs start complaining.

    This comment was originally posted on Macgasm

    Reply

      More from author

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] wrote an article last week about why I write about the Apple community, but if things continue as they are now, there might not be much of a community to write about, and [...]

  2. [...] monetary benefits?  It doesn’t seem alright to me, and it’s becoming quite alarming.  This is not one of the reasons I write about Apple.  It makes me ill, and needs to be [...]

  3. [...] couple months back I wrote a well received post about what I love about the Mac community. It highlighted a bunch of things that I loved, the number of which far out weighed what I dislike [...]

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType